↓ Skip to main content

Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature

Overview of attention for article published in Royal Society Open Science, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters
Title
Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature
Published in
Royal Society Open Science, December 2018
DOI 10.1098/rsos.181281
Authors

Michael J. M. Harrap, Natalie Hempel de Ibarra, Heather M. Whitney, Sean A. Rands

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2018.
All research outputs
#846,260
of 12,300,035 outputs
Outputs from Royal Society Open Science
#676
of 1,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,312
of 172,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Royal Society Open Science
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,300,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.