↓ Skip to main content

Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature

Overview of attention for article published in Royal Society Open Science, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature
Published in
Royal Society Open Science, December 2018
DOI 10.1098/rsos.181281
Authors

Michael J. M. Harrap, Natalie Hempel de Ibarra, Heather M. Whitney, Sean A. Rands

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Other 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 44%
Unspecified 4 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2018.
All research outputs
#879,607
of 12,617,609 outputs
Outputs from Royal Society Open Science
#705
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,956
of 282,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Royal Society Open Science
#15
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,617,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.