↓ Skip to main content

Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature

Overview of attention for article published in Royal Society Open Science, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature
Published in
Royal Society Open Science, December 2018
DOI 10.1098/rsos.181281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. M. Harrap, Natalie Hempel de Ibarra, Heather M. Whitney, Sean A. Rands

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 18 26%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 24%
Engineering 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 20 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,265,350
of 17,039,068 outputs
Outputs from Royal Society Open Science
#1,024
of 3,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,140
of 395,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Royal Society Open Science
#34
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,039,068 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.