@yuval_sapir Hi Yuval, this paper may be useful to distinguish between potential camera options. Good luck! https://t.co/0kJ3mRiUaz
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @BeeChasingMike: New #review out today in Royal Society Open Science: We look at reporting of #Thermal #Imaging in #biology: asking how…
RT @uranus_2: 赤外線サーモグラフィを使った生物学の論文で物質の放射率という最低限報告しなければならないパラメータを記載していない論文が48%。2007~2017に出版された論文で調査Reporting of thermography parameters in b…
赤外線サーモグラフィを使った生物学の論文で物質の放射率という最低限報告しなければならないパラメータを記載していない論文が48%。2007~2017に出版された論文で調査Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature https://t.co/WrSyn2XwSL
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @BeeChasingMike: New #review out today in Royal Society Open Science: We look at reporting of #Thermal #Imaging in #biology: asking how…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
link broken as I think the Royal Society changed their linking style today. Here's the correct doi https://t.co/qH7iQi9IdR
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See our new open access paper for advice on how to do it right! @RSocPublishing @BristolBioSci @CrabExeter https://t.co/qH7iQi9IdR
RT @BeeChasingMike: New #review out today in Royal Society Open Science: We look at reporting of #Thermal #Imaging in #biology: asking how…
@JaniceVaz2 @AW_consultancy
RT @BeeChasingMike: New #review out today in Royal Society Open Science: We look at reporting of #Thermal #Imaging in #biology: asking how…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @BeeChasingMike: New #review out today in Royal Society Open Science: We look at reporting of #Thermal #Imaging in #biology: asking how…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @BeeChasingMike: New #review out today in Royal Society Open Science: We look at reporting of #Thermal #Imaging in #biology: asking how…
RT @BeeChasingMike: New #review out today in Royal Society Open Science: We look at reporting of #Thermal #Imaging in #biology: asking how…
New #review out today in Royal Society Open Science: We look at reporting of #Thermal #Imaging in #biology: asking how well reporting of #thermography is carried out in #biological #science and how best to do this in the future. #IRT #IR https://t.co/F67kR
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
RT @SeanRands: Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See…
Do you use thermography and infrared cameras to do science? 48% of published biology papers report their results poorly. See our new open access paper for advice on how to do it right!@RSocPublishing @BeeChasingMike @BristolBioSci https://t.co/SEiris3Yqe h