↓ Skip to main content

Who let the cats out? A global meta-analysis on risk of parasitic infection in indoor versus outdoor domestic cats ( Felis catus )

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 2,830)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
twitter
235 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Who let the cats out? A global meta-analysis on risk of parasitic infection in indoor versus outdoor domestic cats ( Felis catus )
Published in
Biology Letters, April 2019
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0840
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayleigh Chalkowski, Alan E. Wilson, Christopher A. Lepczyk, Sarah Zohdy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 235 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Environmental Science 10 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 431. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#33,148
of 16,647,928 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#46
of 2,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#889
of 274,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#4
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,647,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.