↓ Skip to main content

Who let the cats out? A global meta-analysis on risk of parasitic infection in indoor versus outdoor domestic cats (Felis catus)

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
42 news outlets
twitter
233 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Who let the cats out? A global meta-analysis on risk of parasitic infection in indoor versus outdoor domestic cats (Felis catus)
Published in
Biology Letters, April 2019
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0840
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayleigh Chalkowski, Alan E. Wilson, Christopher A. Lepczyk, Sarah Zohdy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 233 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 45 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 17%
Environmental Science 24 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 23 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 56 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 483. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#57,268
of 26,174,669 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#67
of 3,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,090
of 367,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#2
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,174,669 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.