↓ Skip to main content

Sexual ornaments but not weapons trade off against testes size in primates

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 7,247)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
36 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
153 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Sexual ornaments but not weapons trade off against testes size in primates
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2019
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.2542
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Lüpold, Leigh W. Simmons, Cyril C. Grueter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 153 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 400. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#23,449
of 12,819,898 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#47
of 7,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#488
of 168,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,819,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.