| Title |
Sexual ornaments but not weapons trade off against testes size in primates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2018.2542 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Lüpold, Leigh W. Simmons, Cyril C. Grueter |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 18 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 10% |
| United States | 12 | 8% |
| Australia | 7 | 5% |
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 64 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 105 | 71% |
| Scientists | 33 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 35% |
| Psychology | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 432. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#62,065
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#130
of 10,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,238
of 357,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.