↓ Skip to main content

Cryptic habitat use of white sharks in kelp forest revealed by animal-borne video

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 2,902)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
250 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Cryptic habitat use of white sharks in kelp forest revealed by animal-borne video
Published in
Biology Letters, April 2019
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver J. D. Jewell, Adrian C. Gleiss, Salvador J. Jorgensen, Samantha Andrzejaczek, Jerry H. Moxley, Stephen J. Beatty, Martin Wikelski, Barbara A. Block, Taylor K. Chapple

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 250 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 42%
Environmental Science 18 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Philosophy 1 1%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 470. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#31,494
of 17,923,622 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#44
of 2,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#803
of 278,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,923,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.