↓ Skip to main content

Cryptic habitat use of white sharks in kelp forest revealed by animal-borne video

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
244 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Cryptic habitat use of white sharks in kelp forest revealed by animal-borne video
Published in
Biology Letters, April 2019
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver J. D. Jewell, Adrian C. Gleiss, Salvador J. Jorgensen, Samantha Andrzejaczek, Jerry H. Moxley, Stephen J. Beatty, Martin Wikelski, Barbara A. Block, Taylor K. Chapple

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 244 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 38%
Environmental Science 18 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 463. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#44,773
of 22,067,443 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#54
of 3,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#911
of 290,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,067,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.