↓ Skip to main content

Cryptic habitat use of white sharks in kelp forest revealed by animal-borne video

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
232 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Cryptic habitat use of white sharks in kelp forest revealed by animal-borne video
Published in
Biology Letters, April 2019
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver J. D. Jewell, Adrian C. Gleiss, Salvador J. Jorgensen, Samantha Andrzejaczek, Jerry H. Moxley, Stephen J. Beatty, Martin Wikelski, Barbara A. Block, Taylor K. Chapple

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 232 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 38%
Environmental Science 22 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 451. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#63,375
of 25,939,391 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#70
of 3,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,240
of 367,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#3
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,939,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.