| Title |
Cryptic habitat use of white sharks in kelp forest revealed by animal-borne video
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Letters, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oliver J. D. Jewell, Adrian C. Gleiss, Salvador J. Jorgensen, Samantha Andrzejaczek, Jerry H. Moxley, Stephen J. Beatty, Martin Wikelski, Barbara A. Block, Taylor K. Chapple |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 235 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 12% |
| Australia | 18 | 8% |
| France | 10 | 4% |
| South Africa | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 93 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 162 | 69% |
| Scientists | 64 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 453. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#61,625
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#69
of 3,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,220
of 365,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.