The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 235 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Cryptic habitat use of white sharks in kelp forest revealed by animal-borne video
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biology Letters, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0085 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Oliver J. D. Jewell, Adrian C. Gleiss, Salvador J. Jorgensen, Samantha Andrzejaczek, Jerry H. Moxley, Stephen J. Beatty, Martin Wikelski, Barbara A. Block, Taylor K. Chapple |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 38 | 16% |
United Kingdom | 19 | 8% |
Australia | 13 | 6% |
South Africa | 6 | 3% |
Canada | 6 | 3% |
France | 6 | 3% |
Spain | 3 | 1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 11 | 5% |
Unknown | 130 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 162 | 69% |
Scientists | 64 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
Researcher | 16 | 17% |
Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 37% |
Environmental Science | 22 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 453. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#64,454
of 26,375,498 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#70
of 3,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,246
of 368,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#3
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.