| Title |
Ecological continuity and transformation after the Permo-Triassic mass extinction in northeastern Panthalassa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Letters, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0902 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley A. Dineen, Peter D. Roopnarine, Margaret L. Fraiser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Argentina | 1 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#773,880
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#772
of 3,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,965
of 365,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#17
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.