↓ Skip to main content

Social affiliation matters: both same-sex and opposite-sex relationships predict survival in wild female baboons

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
50 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
Title
Social affiliation matters: both same-sex and opposite-sex relationships predict survival in wild female baboons
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2014
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2014.1261
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Archie, Jenny Tung, Michael Clark, Jeanne Altmann, Susan C. Alberts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 343 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 26%
Student > Master 51 14%
Researcher 44 12%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 49 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 183 52%
Environmental Science 29 8%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Psychology 19 5%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 66 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 245. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#153,578
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#345
of 11,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,364
of 273,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.