Title |
Sensory integration of danger and safety cues may explain the fear of a quiet coyote
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2023.1812 |
Authors |
Jennifer E. Smith, Chelsea Carminito, Shea Hamilton, Kate Lee Newcomb, Clare Randt, Sarah Travenick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 24% |
France | 2 | 6% |
Hong Kong | 2 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Norway | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Peru | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 65% |
Scientists | 10 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
Other | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,638,564
of 24,929,945 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#3,542
of 10,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,889
of 298,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#55
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,929,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.