↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of equality and inequality in mammalian societies

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Mechanisms of equality and inequality in mammalian societies
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2023
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2022.0307
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer E. Smith, Barbara Natterson-Horowitz, Maddison M. Mueller, Michael E. Alfaro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 22%
Psychology 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 15 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,316,528
of 26,314,972 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,152
of 7,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,507
of 385,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#18
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.