Toward an evolutionary ecology of (in)equality
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2023
Eric Alden Smith, Jennifer E. Smith, Brian F. Codding
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||38%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Arts and Humanities||1||13%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||13%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||13%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,079,942 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
of 6,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 238,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,079,942 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.