| Title |
Hidden species diversity in an iconic living fossil vertebrate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Letters, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0395 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chase D. Brownstein, Daemin Kim, Oliver D. Orr, Gabriela M. Hogue, Bryn H. Tracy, M. Worth Pugh, Randal Singer, Chelsea Myles-McBurney, Jon Michael Mollish, Jeffrey W. Simmons, Solomon R. David, Gregory Watkins-Colwell, Eva A. Hoffman, Thomas J. Near |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 178 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 51 | 29% |
| Canada | 9 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 5% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 81 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 133 | 75% |
| Scientists | 37 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#333,810
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#369
of 3,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,297
of 492,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#5
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.