↓ Skip to main content

Sex bias in intergroup conflict and collective movements among social mammals: male warriors and female guides

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
110 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Sex bias in intergroup conflict and collective movements among social mammals: male warriors and female guides
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2022
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2021.0142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer E. Smith, Claudia Fichtel, Rose K. Holmes, Peter M. Kappeler, Mark van Vugt, Adrian V. Jaeggi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 18 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 24%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 23 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#647,259
of 26,317,969 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#552
of 7,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,632
of 454,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,317,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.