↓ Skip to main content

Sex bias in intergroup conflict and collective movements among social mammals: male warriors and female guides

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
114 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Sex bias in intergroup conflict and collective movements among social mammals: male warriors and female guides
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2022
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2021.0142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer E. Smith, Claudia Fichtel, Rose K. Holmes, Peter M. Kappeler, Mark van Vugt, Adrian V. Jaeggi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Unspecified 4 12%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Unspecified 5 15%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#508,744
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#428
of 6,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,859
of 440,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#3
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.