↓ Skip to main content

Sex bias in intergroup conflict and collective movements among social mammals: male warriors and female guides

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
104 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions
Title
Sex bias in intergroup conflict and collective movements among social mammals: male warriors and female guides
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2022
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2021.0142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer E. Smith, Claudia Fichtel, Rose K. Holmes, Peter M. Kappeler, Mark van Vugt, Adrian V. Jaeggi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#480,555
of 21,132,923 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#411
of 6,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,942
of 294,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#5
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,132,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.