The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||21||46%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||4||9%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||7%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||5||38%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||8%|
|Student > Master||1||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||4||31%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 216. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,915,168 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
of 3,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 422,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,915,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.