RT @nyuprimatology: Dunbar’s number was a wonderful piece of scientific storytelling, but it was never science. Hopefully it might be possi…
RT @dosima_org: 150 is nonsense, as anyone with an Indian grandmother could tell ‘scientists’ https://t.co/cQF9DwgSHk
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @jens2go: How many stable #social #relationships can an individual human maintain? 150 - according #DunbarsNumber. A new study (Biology…
RT @jens2go: How many stable #social #relationships can an individual human maintain? 150 - according #DunbarsNumber. A new study (Biology…
RT @jens2go: How many stable #social #relationships can an individual human maintain? 150 - according #DunbarsNumber. A new study (Biology…
‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed | Biology Letters https://t.co/Fs0gPJCBLf
150 is nonsense, as anyone with an Indian grandmother could tell ‘scientists’
How many stable #social #relationships can an individual human maintain? 150 - according #DunbarsNumber. A new study (Biology Letters 17(5), 2021 🔓) by @p_lindenfors, A. Wartel, & @etologen begs to differ (and who isn't up for some academic dispute?🍿)
RT @pitiklinov: "El "número de Dunbar" es un concepto con una base teórica escasa que carece de apoyo empírico."
RT @ManoloSanchezA: El "número de Dunbar" es la cantidad de personas que pueden relacionarse en un sistema determinado. Teóricamente es de…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @ManoloSanchezA: El "número de Dunbar" es la cantidad de personas que pueden relacionarse en un sistema determinado. Teóricamente es de…
RT @nyuprimatology: Dunbar’s number was a wonderful piece of scientific storytelling, but it was never science. Hopefully it might be possi…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @nyuprimatology: Dunbar’s number was a wonderful piece of scientific storytelling, but it was never science. Hopefully it might be possi…
RT @jmmgazquez: Refutan en un nuevo estudio el Nº de Dunbar (lím.150 individuos) asumiendo que la extrapolación de los límites cognitivos h…
RT @MatthewZipple: I was very glad to see this article. It always seemed ludicrous to imagine that the claimed 150-person limit on social…
RT @pitiklinov: "El "número de Dunbar" es un concepto con una base teórica escasa que carece de apoyo empírico." https://t.co/XRPv6N20x8
Yes, you can have more than 150 friends: New study deconstructs Dunbar's number and states that a cognitive limit on human group size cannot be derived in this manner. ‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed https://t.co/fyZxIsErEV https://t.co/Db3sTBC2CW
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @Anthrofuentes: "However, enormous 95% confidence intervals (4–520 and 2–336, respectively) imply that specifying any one number is futi…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @pitiklinov: "El "número de Dunbar" es un concepto con una base teórica escasa que carece de apoyo empírico."
RT @nyuprimatology: Dunbar’s number was a wonderful piece of scientific storytelling, but it was never science. Hopefully it might be possi…
RT @nyuprimatology: Dunbar’s number was a wonderful piece of scientific storytelling, but it was never science. Hopefully it might be possi…
RT @jmmgazquez: Por no hablar del estilo social de cada especie (monógamas, solitarias, multimacho-multihembra, harén, fisión-fusión, etc.)…
RT @jmmgazquez: Refutan en un nuevo estudio el Nº de Dunbar (lím.150 individuos) asumiendo que la extrapolación de los límites cognitivos h…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
Also worth reupping this critical question today: now that analyses have shown that there are as many Dunbar's numbers as there are ways of looking at the data, what's the maximum number of Dunbar's numbers a society can sustain before it needs to split? h
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
I bet it was also a lot of fun for the reviewers and editor of this paper. Nice work!
‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed | Biology Letters https://t.co/7Bh168PrxK
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @nyuprimatology: Dunbar’s number was a wonderful piece of scientific storytelling, but it was never science. Hopefully it might be possi…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @nyuprimatology: Dunbar’s number was a wonderful piece of scientific storytelling, but it was never science. Hopefully it might be possi…
RT @jmmgazquez: Refutan en un nuevo estudio el Nº de Dunbar (lím.150 individuos) asumiendo que la extrapolación de los límites cognitivos h…
This is a must read if you study the "social brain" or ever cite Dunbar.
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @ManoloSanchezA: El "número de Dunbar" es la cantidad de personas que pueden relacionarse en un sistema determinado. Teóricamente es de…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @jakmarcin: Ciekawe, tzw. liczba Dunbara, tak często używana w poradnikach i literaturze popularnonaukowej nie ma potwierdzenia w faktac…
Pues resulta que el número de Dunbar para los humanos, esas 150 relaciones con personas que uno puede "manejar", es una extrapolación a partir de datos de otros primates, y que cualquier número por el que lo sustituyamos será erróneo (no podemos calcularlo
RT @jmmgazquez: Por no hablar del estilo social de cada especie (monógamas, solitarias, multimacho-multihembra, harén, fisión-fusión, etc.)…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @Anthrofuentes: "However, enormous 95% confidence intervals (4–520 and 2–336, respectively) imply that specifying any one number is futi…
RT @LesleyNewson: Another nail in the coffin of this strange idea that Robin Dunbar himself didn't seem to take very seriously. But it "wen…
Por no hablar del estilo social de cada especie (monógamas, solitarias, multimacho-multihembra, harén, fisión-fusión, etc.), la gestión de tiempo, la neotenia, la longevidad, la pervivencia demográfica y otros elementos que modulan la creación de nichos cu
RT @nyuprimatology: Dunbar’s number was a wonderful piece of scientific storytelling, but it was never science. Hopefully it might be possi…
Dunbar’s number was a wonderful piece of scientific storytelling, but it was never science. Hopefully it might be possible to now move past it, but my experience is that such ideas are hard to kill off. They stalk the discourse as zombie hypotheses, infect
‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed | Biology Letters https://t.co/1NGSN1Vhl2
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @Jordan_SMartin: "Thus, ecological research on primate sociality, the uniqueness of human thinking and empirical observations all indica…
Another nail in the coffin of this strange idea that Robin Dunbar himself didn't seem to take very seriously. But it "went viral" and started turning up everywhere. ‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed | Biology Letters https://t.co/mGuNnubMob
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @ManoloSanchezA: El "número de Dunbar" es la cantidad de personas que pueden relacionarse en un sistema determinado. Teóricamente es de…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
superb science sassing @p_lindenfors et al monkeying around by "extrapolating a regression … [from] primates, to humans" ht @Anthrofuentes @LydiaMHopper
RT @ManoloSanchezA: El "número de Dunbar" es la cantidad de personas que pueden relacionarse en un sistema determinado. Teóricamente es de…
RT @ManoloSanchezA: El "número de Dunbar" es la cantidad de personas que pueden relacionarse en un sistema determinado. Teóricamente es de…
RT @jmmgazquez: Refutan en un nuevo estudio el Nº de Dunbar (lím.150 individuos) asumiendo que la extrapolación de los límites cognitivos h…
El "número de Dunbar" es la cantidad de personas que pueden relacionarse en un sistema determinado. Teóricamente es de 150 personas y está relacionado con el tamaño de la neocorteza cerebral y su capacidad de proceso. Bueno, pues es un mito sin base cient
RT @LydiaMHopper: Love the science & the sass: “extrapolating human cognitive limits from regressions on non-human primate data is of limit…
Re:Dunbar’s number of social interactions to describe brain capacity: Bayesian & least squares methods yielded group sizes of 69–109 & 16–42, w 95% CI of 4–520 & 2–336). This suggests a single number for cognitive limit on human group size cann
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
"El "número de Dunbar" es un concepto con una base teórica escasa que carece de apoyo empírico."
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @SemplePrimate: @ChoralsScholar This may be of interest: https://t.co/VtQ5ETyuol
@ChoralsScholar This may be of interest: https://t.co/VtQ5ETyuol
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @LydiaMHopper: Love the science & the sass: “extrapolating human cognitive limits from regressions on non-human primate data is of limit…
RT @LydiaMHopper: Love the science & the sass: “extrapolating human cognitive limits from regressions on non-human primate data is of limit…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
Refutan en un nuevo estudio el Nº de Dunbar (lím.150 individuos) asumiendo que la extrapolación de los límites cognitivos humanos a partir de regresiones sobre datos de primates no humanos tiene un valor limitado por razones tanto teóricas como empíricas h