RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
Love the science & the sass: “extrapolating human cognitive limits from regressions on non-human primate data is of limited value for both theoretical and empirical reasons. It is our hope, though perhaps futile, that this study will put an end to the
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
It’s about time this was published.
RT @jakmarcin: Ciekawe, tzw. liczba Dunbara, tak często używana w poradnikach i literaturze popularnonaukowej nie ma potwierdzenia w faktac…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @MatthewZipple: I was very glad to see this article. It always seemed ludicrous to imagine that the claimed 150-person limit on social…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
"However, enormous 95% confidence intervals (4–520 and 2–336, respectively) imply that specifying any one number is futile. A cognitive limit on human group size cannot be derived in this manner." Finally. Thank you.
RT @jakmarcin: Ciekawe, tzw. liczba Dunbara, tak często używana w poradnikach i literaturze popularnonaukowej nie ma potwierdzenia w faktac…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
I was very glad to see this article. It always seemed ludicrous to imagine that the claimed 150-person limit on social cognition was at all meaningful, and Lindenfors et al. show convincingly that it is not. https://t.co/vQSmsnalSQ
Ciekawe, tzw. liczba Dunbara, tak często używana w poradnikach i literaturze popularnonaukowej nie ma potwierdzenia w faktach. Liczba Dunbara, to domniemany limit liczby (150) osób z którymi Homo Sapiens jest w stanie tworzyć relacje. https://t.co/eZXt2JPO
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
"Thus, ecological research on primate sociality, the uniqueness of human thinking and empirical observations all indicate that there is no hard cognitive limit on human sociality. Our reanalysis provides the last piece of evidence needed to disregard Dunba
@ThatChrisRyan
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
Blaming cracked dot com and them calling it some stupid thing like the monkey sphere or whatever.
@davidwengrow might find this interesting.
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
RT @julxf: This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately,…
This: "‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed" | Biology Letters. I hope this paper will get the attention it deserves. Unfortunately, scientific "urban myths" travel on wings, and truth comes limping behind. Hat tip to Lindenfors et al. https://t.co/D90HZA3iB2
‘Dunbar's number’ deconstructed | Biology Letters https://t.co/ng5T6hOaqb
‘Dunbar’s number’ is deconstructed in new #BiologyLetters paper https://t.co/pAfAY70Wcz https://t.co/8OKfFAyT5c
The #Dunbar number sets at 150 the maximum amount of friends we can have. This study argues that Dunbar’s number is not a reasonable way of decrypting human #sociality https://t.co/5yHrXnFztg
My excuse for mixing people up or forgetting them may not work: the maximum group size of 150 does not seem to be a useful estimate. https://t.co/z3pGQzzYLO https://t.co/9X3wvROF19