↓ Skip to main content

Understanding and combating misperceived polarization

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Understanding and combating misperceived polarization
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, February 2021
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2020.0143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Lees, Mina Cikara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor 6 7%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 28%
Social Sciences 12 13%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#665,450
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#573
of 7,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,144
of 456,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#15
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.