The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||9||32%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||12||16%|
|Student > Master||11||14%|
|Student > Bachelor||7||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Arts and Humanities||3||4%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||3||4%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||3||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,935,186 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
of 6,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 426,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,935,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.