| Title |
Radiation of tropical island bees and the role of phylogenetic niche conservatism as an important driver of biodiversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2020.0045 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James B. Dorey, Scott V. C. Groom, Elisha H. Freedman, Cale S. Matthews, Olivia K. Davies, Ella J. Deans, Celina Rebola, Mark I. Stevens, Michael S. Y. Lee, Michael P. Schwarz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 45% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#905,587
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,175
of 11,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,986
of 403,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#40
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.