| Title |
The longer the better: evidence that narwhal tusks are sexually selected
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Letters, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0950 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zackary A. Graham, Eva Garde, Mads Peter Heide-Jørgensen, Alexandre V. Palaoro |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 10% |
| Canada | 8 | 6% |
| Japan | 8 | 6% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 94 | 66% |
| Scientists | 43 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 444. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#58,941
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#68
of 3,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,804
of 370,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#6
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.