↓ Skip to main content

Contagious yawning is not a signal of empathy: no evidence of familiarity, gender or prosociality biases in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
89 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Contagious yawning is not a signal of empathy: no evidence of familiarity, gender or prosociality biases in dogs
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, February 2020
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2019.2236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Neilands, Scott Claessens, Ivy Ren, Rebecca Hassall, Amalia P. M. Bastos, Alex H. Taylor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#147,778
of 19,169,076 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#397
of 9,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,757
of 353,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#11
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,169,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.