↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative study of developmental biology confirms Dickinsonia as a metazoan

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
48 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative study of developmental biology confirms Dickinsonia as a metazoan
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2017
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2017.1348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renee S. Hoekzema, Martin D. Brasier, Frances S. Dunn, Alexander G. Liu

Abstract

The late Ediacaran soft-bodied macroorganism Dickinsonia (age range approx. 560-550 Ma) has often been interpreted as an early animal, and is increasingly invoked in debate on the evolutionary assembly of eumetazoan body plans. However, conclusive positive evidence in support of such a phylogenetic affinity has not been forthcoming. Here we subject a collection of Dickinsonia specimens interpreted to represent multiple ontogenetic stages to a novel, quantitative method for studying growth and development in organisms with an iterative body plan. Our study demonstrates that Dickinsonia grew via pre-terminal 'deltoidal' insertion and inflation of constructional units, followed by a later inflation-dominated phase of growth. This growth model is contrary to the widely held assumption that Dickinsonia grew via terminal addition of units at the end of the organism bearing the smallest units. When considered alongside morphological and behavioural attributes, our developmental data phylogenetically constrain Dickinsonia to the Metazoa, specifically the Eumetazoa plus Placozoa total group. Our findings have implications for the use of Dickinsonia in developmental debates surrounding the metazoan acquisition of axis specification and metamerism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 22%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2022.
All research outputs
#336,571
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#839
of 11,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,107
of 324,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#21
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.