| Title |
A review of the UK and British Channel Islands practical tidal stream energy resource
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rspa.2021.0469 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Coles, Athanasios Angeloudis, Deborah Greaves, Gordon Hastie, Matthew Lewis, Lucas Mackie, James McNaughton, Jon Miles, Simon Neill, Matthew Piggott, Denise Risch, Beth Scott, Carol Sparling, Tim Stallard, Philipp Thies, Stuart Walker, David White, Richard Willden, Benjamin Williamson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 21 | 39% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 81% |
| Scientists | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 58 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 17% |
| Energy | 11 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 62 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 295. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#121,321
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
#16
of 3,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,345
of 446,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.