@brunnosarttori Sobre máscaras também não é mentira. OMS revisou posição. Um estudo pra você ler no dia do trabalho. https://t.co/3lXdTrLB69
RT @jmcrookston: Another: Randall, Ewald, Marr, Jimenez and Bourouiba. ‘How Did We Get Here: What Are Droplets and Aerosols and How Far Do…
@EpiEllie FYI your readers, this historical perspective from @linseymarr VA Tech group provides lots of background & past missteps. I think Wired magazine also did some interesting work on this during pandemic https://t.co/miu7OkINJR
RT @equibotanica: @EpiEllie What's the source for your definition of droplet? I'd be inclined to go with the terminology used by people w…
@EpiEllie Because the aerosol-droplet dichotomy is a scientific misunderstanding ⬇️ Randall et al. 2021. How did we get here: what are droplets and aerosols and how far do they go? A historical perspective on the transmission of respiratory infectious dise
@EpiEllie What's the source for your definition of droplet? I'd be inclined to go with the terminology used by people who study this stuff, e.g., @linseymarr lydia bourouiba, Kristin Coleman, @Don_Milton @jljcolorado and others . https://t.co/hCiu149KGd
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @linseymarr: Epic thread by @jljcolorado summarizing the history of how people have thought about airborne transmission (https://t.co/8i…
RT @JOHNJOHNSTONED: Understanding how we got it wrong and how dogma developed is crucial to moving on….. ID/IPAC need to look at the scienc…
RT @ninjacheck: @YouAreLobbyLud 'How did we get here: what are droplets and aerosols and how far do they go? A historical perspective on th…
RT @JOHNJOHNSTONED: Understanding how we got it wrong and how dogma developed is crucial to moving on….. ID/IPAC need to look at the scienc…
Understanding how we got it wrong and how dogma developed is crucial to moving on….. ID/IPAC need to look at the science behind their beliefs and reevaluate their teaching “Only then can we understand how various schools of thought from a range of scienti
@YouAreLobbyLud 'How did we get here: what are droplets and aerosols and how far do they go? A historical perspective on the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases' https://t.co/n8NKLC4JPa
RT @jljcolorado: 90/ Here is when we think that the ERROR of "5 micron particles fall to the ground in 1-2 m" originated: Only TB and biow…
RT @jljcolorado: 76/ We investigated the history of the 5 micron / 2 meters error in a previous paper led by @linseymarr and the extraordin…
RT @jljcolorado: 52/ Rather, Flügge and collaborators used the term “droplet” to refer to fresh particles of ALL SIZES, including AEROSOLS…
RT @jljcolorado: 49/ ...blankets, bowls, & other objects was dispersed into air. In contrast, Flügge thought that it was not DRIED secret…
RT @jljcolorado: 105/ Adherents of droplet transmission were in control of all key public health institutions. Scientists proposing airbor…
RT @jljcolorado: 105/ Adherents of droplet transmission were in control of all key public health institutions. Scientists proposing airbor…
RT @jljcolorado: 90/ Here is when we think that the ERROR of "5 micron particles fall to the ground in 1-2 m" originated: Only TB and biow…
RT @jljcolorado: 76/ We investigated the history of the 5 micron / 2 meters error in a previous paper led by @linseymarr and the extraordin…
RT @jljcolorado: 52/ Rather, Flügge and collaborators used the term “droplet” to refer to fresh particles of ALL SIZES, including AEROSOLS…
RT @jljcolorado: 49/ ...blankets, bowls, & other objects was dispersed into air. In contrast, Flügge thought that it was not DRIED secret…
@BostonBloodSox @DanishScience @LaGrecca333 @KristenMeghan @pettypodcast1 The only plausible mechanism is interception of droplets (larger than aerosols) from coughing and sneezing. Except, droplets deposited on masks dry out and…become aerosols. https://t
RT @jljcolorado: 76/ We investigated the history of the 5 micron / 2 meters error in a previous paper led by @linseymarr and the extraordin…
RT @delarosaceae: @UNAMPUIREE Las "microgotas de Flügge" incluyen a lo que ahora llamamos aerosoles: https://t.co/hrPVkT1MHw
@UNAMPUIREE Las "microgotas de Flügge" incluyen a lo que ahora llamamos aerosoles: https://t.co/hrPVkT1MHw
RT @jljcolorado: 105/ Adherents of droplet transmission were in control of all key public health institutions. Scientists proposing airbor…
@NJB781 @ProHealth4MyKid @MctagueNicole @aftab_usa Since the mid-1800s, the medical community has't recognized that viruses can be airborne; everyone believed in droplet dogma. Thanks to Covid, we now know that the air is not always "normal" and can be lad
RT @joshcmorrison: Re: the whole "droplets vs. aerosols" COVID spread debate, it's bizarre and unsettling that a basic and foundational mis…
RT @jljcolorado: 106/ And the Randall et al. paper was published in final form a while back (shorter period of history, from Flugge to now,…
RT @jljcolorado: 76/ We investigated the history of the 5 micron / 2 meters error in a previous paper led by @linseymarr and the extraordin…
RT @jljcolorado: 52/ Rather, Flügge and collaborators used the term “droplet” to refer to fresh particles of ALL SIZES, including AEROSOLS…
RT @jljcolorado: 49/ ...blankets, bowls, & other objects was dispersed into air. In contrast, Flügge thought that it was not DRIED secret…
RT @jljcolorado: 105/ Adherents of droplet transmission were in control of all key public health institutions. Scientists proposing airbor…
RT @jljcolorado: 105/ Adherents of droplet transmission were in control of all key public health institutions. Scientists proposing airbor…
RT @jljcolorado: 76/ We investigated the history of the 5 micron / 2 meters error in a previous paper led by @linseymarr and the extraordin…
RT @jljcolorado: 52/ Rather, Flügge and collaborators used the term “droplet” to refer to fresh particles of ALL SIZES, including AEROSOLS…
@GordonFbpe @PDXFato Well he blocked me before I could send this: Here's a Royal Society paper on the false dichotomy of droplet/aerosol. It will point you toward other research. https://t.co/fvPxgrSrhn
@ChrisAlvino All this because WHO never recognized COVID19 as AIRBORN, and not just 1 to 2 meter spread. Read Prof L. BOUROUIBA, MIT, on the history of mistaken ideas. https://t.co/XuJT7S7Sy2
@Its_Airborne @mvankerkhove Context is best given here: https://t.co/8o09d20Hms and https://t.co/Q2sSXsJWFz, including the personal tragedies of both Wells and Mills.
@MikaelNiku Historia! Ilmavälitteisessä pandemiassa syytä tuntea ilman osuuden, "tartuttavien pärskeiden", jyrkkien väittämien ja todellisen tiedontason tausta - tarkoituksenmukaisten alojen kautta. Korjaava tieto on ollut kirjoissa kauan. https://t.co/ix
RT @jljcolorado: 52/ Rather, Flügge and collaborators used the term “droplet” to refer to fresh particles of ALL SIZES, including AEROSOLS…
RT @jljcolorado: 49/ ...blankets, bowls, & other objects was dispersed into air. In contrast, Flügge thought that it was not DRIED secret…
@theAliceRoberts @deloreancars and another source on the roots of the confusion https://t.co/FNLav0UYDH
@theAliceRoberts @Hoggle42 According to this, it isn't. Perhaps this is a golden opportunity to correct what appears to be a long-standing erroneous belief within medicine, rather than an excuse for finger-pointing? https://t.co/h9ii49CjgX https://t.co/h
RT @jljcolorado: 90/ Here is when we think that the ERROR of "5 micron particles fall to the ground in 1-2 m" originated: Only TB and biow…
典拠(100を超える連続ポスト) https://t.co/nxgPBXbgl2 研究論文になってる https://t.co/DFQWWxOfyJ
Pisses me off how Health dumb down respiratory infectious diseases awareness campaigns by using "droplet" and never "aerosol" when describing airborne transmission. They are taking advantage of Science's lack of definition consensus, which creates debates
RT @jljcolorado: 90/ Here is when we think that the ERROR of "5 micron particles fall to the ground in 1-2 m" originated: Only TB and biow…
@saffrontrail @theliverdr We need to be fair here - science makes mistakes too - it is not infallible - and don’t trash the whole system - suggest better controls ! Further he needs to abrasive with science too . Interesting article attached https://t.co
RT @jljcolorado: 105/ Adherents of droplet transmission were in control of all key public health institutions. Scientists proposing airbor…
RT @jljcolorado: 90/ Here is when we think that the ERROR of "5 micron particles fall to the ground in 1-2 m" originated: Only TB and biow…
RT @jljcolorado: 76/ We investigated the history of the 5 micron / 2 meters error in a previous paper led by @linseymarr and the extraordin…
RT @jljcolorado: 52/ Rather, Flügge and collaborators used the term “droplet” to refer to fresh particles of ALL SIZES, including AEROSOLS…
RT @jljcolorado: 49/ ...blankets, bowls, & other objects was dispersed into air. In contrast, Flügge thought that it was not DRIED secret…
@joemorin73 MISINFORMATION! Both spreaders droplets are 5-10 microns size, and aerosols are < 5 microns size. Conclusion, your mask with 100 (!) microns size mazes is USELESS!! https://t.co/xIaldv3LSY'.
RT @Hiroshi_Tsuji: いずれも最新流体力学では間違いとされる •飛沫/エアロゾルのカットオフは5μm •飛沫は6feet(1.83m)飛ぶ これら起源を調べたこの査読前論文が出版されました。 各種ガイドラインはコロナで加速したエアロゾル研究や、飛沫で説明出来…
RT @linseymarr: Our paper examining the origins of the erroneous 5 μm cutoff for aerosols v. droplets and the 6' rule is now published. One…
RT @Hiroshi_Tsuji: いずれも最新流体力学では間違いとされる •飛沫/エアロゾルのカットオフは5μm •飛沫は6feet(1.83m)飛ぶ これら起源を調べたこの査読前論文が出版されました。 各種ガイドラインはコロナで加速したエアロゾル研究や、飛沫で説明出来…
RT @jljcolorado: 105/ Adherents of droplet transmission were in control of all key public health institutions. Scientists proposing airbor…
RT @jljcolorado: 76/ We investigated the history of the 5 micron / 2 meters error in a previous paper led by @linseymarr and the extraordin…
RT @jljcolorado: 52/ Rather, Flügge and collaborators used the term “droplet” to refer to fresh particles of ALL SIZES, including AEROSOLS…
RT @jljcolorado: 105/ Adherents of droplet transmission were in control of all key public health institutions. Scientists proposing airbor…
RT @jljcolorado: 105/ Adherents of droplet transmission were in control of all key public health institutions. Scientists proposing airbor…
RT @jljcolorado: 90/ Here is when we think that the ERROR of "5 micron particles fall to the ground in 1-2 m" originated: Only TB and biow…
RT @jljcolorado: 76/ We investigated the history of the 5 micron / 2 meters error in a previous paper led by @linseymarr and the extraordin…
RT @jljcolorado: 52/ Rather, Flügge and collaborators used the term “droplet” to refer to fresh particles of ALL SIZES, including AEROSOLS…
RT @jljcolorado: 49/ ...blankets, bowls, & other objects was dispersed into air. In contrast, Flügge thought that it was not DRIED secret…
RT @jljcolorado: 76/ We investigated the history of the 5 micron / 2 meters error in a previous paper led by @linseymarr and the extraordin…
RT @jljcolorado: 52/ Rather, Flügge and collaborators used the term “droplet” to refer to fresh particles of ALL SIZES, including AEROSOLS…
RT @jljcolorado: 49/ ...blankets, bowls, & other objects was dispersed into air. In contrast, Flügge thought that it was not DRIED secret…