RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
@tessier_mich @Cote_Science Read the papers, it'll make more sense https://t.co/2sbbyuLMYD https://t.co/GiDblohdxr
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 106/ And the Randall et al. paper was published in final form a while back (shorter period of history, from Flugge to now,…
RT @jljcolorado: 14/ For more details on the history, see the Randall et al. paper that we recently published in J. Royal Society Interface…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
RT @jljcolorado: 18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of t…
@asencro
18/ And I forgot to link this outstanding @wired article, that summarizes some of the COVID-19 debate and the origins of the 5 micron error, with a lot of historical context. The research article it refers to is now published at: https://t.co/2sbbyuLMYD h
@Rich302uk @Sarcysocialist @ChiddyFluff @JujuliaGrace You might want to read this https://t.co/9Jilf8DIPu
@microdoodles @urbanpsych0 @dianaberrent @DrEricDing @Delta @kprather88 https://t.co/I0myVZ6r4Z That said, they certainly do good at preventing transmission (see above), but said good is limited. Note that surgical masks are also intended to protect the m
@smenor @apoorva_nyc @cdc @CDCDirector The really embarrassing thing is this "droplet vs. aerosol transmission" thing, complete with the terrible "below 5-micron = aerosols" notion, was based on a historical misunderstanding from a game of telephone. http
No me canso de leer este hilo. Dogmas impuestos por una élite iletrada. Que mal diseño de las instituciones y sus jerarcas.
@Teddybird @krishlex @YouTube @gideonlasco @DOHgovph @ntfcovid19ph @iamguidodavid @friaronwater @trishgreenhalgh @DFisman So it IS real world data with real humans. Not in vitro or dummies or anything like that. And droplets is an error from 1910. When Ch
Efectivamente, aquí tenemos al iluminado que sigue aún en marzo de 2020. Por gente como ésta aún hay quien sigue desinfectando paradas de autobús y lavando con lejía la comida que compra.
Sabía que sus teorías eran falsas, pero no sabía que carecía de comprensión lectora. Si lee bien el tuit citado, verá que digo claramente que se transmite POR el aire, pero no EN el aire.
RT @jljcolorado: @julyapepry @AlguienLibre_ Algún iluminao se ha quedado atascado en marzo 2020, todavía piensan q virus no se transmite po…
RT @MaliciaWildpret: HIGIENE RESPIRATORIA. El concepto del momento.
RT @jljcolorado: @julyapepry @AlguienLibre_ Algún iluminao se ha quedado atascado en marzo 2020, todavía piensan q virus no se transmite po…
RT @jljcolorado: @julyapepry @AlguienLibre_ Algún iluminao se ha quedado atascado en marzo 2020, todavía piensan q virus no se transmite po…
@JuninDiresa para q se actualicen
RT @jljcolorado: @julyapepry @AlguienLibre_ Algún iluminao se ha quedado atascado en marzo 2020, todavía piensan q virus no se transmite po…
RT @jljcolorado: @julyapepry @AlguienLibre_ Algún iluminao se ha quedado atascado en marzo 2020, todavía piensan q virus no se transmite po…
HIGIENE RESPIRATORIA. El concepto del momento.
RT @jljcolorado: @julyapepry @AlguienLibre_ Algún iluminao se ha quedado atascado en marzo 2020, todavía piensan q virus no se transmite po…
RT @jljcolorado: @julyapepry @AlguienLibre_ Algún iluminao se ha quedado atascado en marzo 2020, todavía piensan q virus no se transmite po…
RT @jljcolorado: @julyapepry @AlguienLibre_ Algún iluminao se ha quedado atascado en marzo 2020, todavía piensan q virus no se transmite po…
RT @jljcolorado: @julyapepry @AlguienLibre_ Algún iluminao se ha quedado atascado en marzo 2020, todavía piensan q virus no se transmite po…
@julyapepry @AlguienLibre_ Algún iluminao se ha quedado atascado en marzo 2020, todavía piensan q virus no se transmite por el aire. Sólo tienen q ir a la página web de la OMS, q lo dice claramente. Lo de las gotas es un error de 1910, como explicamos en:
RT @claudanzer: How generalizations from TB research applied to other infectious diseases led to critical decisions in Covid public health…
How generalizations from TB research applied to other infectious diseases led to critical decisions in Covid public health recommendations... This is a fascinating historical perspective on the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases. https://t.co/
@kdenheijer And if you want to learn more about the basis of the historical error that you ar repeating, see this preprint and paper: https://t.co/GiDblohdxr https://t.co/biDRIFKG9V
@jdceulaer Goed bedoeld een nuance toevoegend: Het is niet of droplet, of aërosol. Het is en/en. Het is voornamelijk/grotendeels aërosol, maar ook wel wat droplet. t is net dat foutief binair denken dat initieel voor misverstanden zorgde. Historisch goe
@karenrcaris @LolaPal26351221 @colbetzor @benshapiro Nope. I am still right. https://t.co/kq3vTVP4nr https://t.co/Prc2351tAm
▪️#covidisairborne. Breathing, talking, singing. Builds up like smoke in indoor spaces. Aerosols, not spittle-droplets 💦. Say it. Loud. https://t.co/7A1xSGzGGd https://t.co/diQ3u9ArhK … https://t.co/hItQ8omizv
@EntreprisasC @Beatriz02753967 @DLibertarian99 @Proserp40164173 @bwlng8 @LibertadDePens3 @alfwarrior @WHO Lo de las gotículas es en su mayoría un error histórico (confundieron short-range airborne con droplets). Lo explicamos en este artículo: https://t.c
RT @vuduish: @parritilla No: que las gotículas, i.e., partículas gruesas que caen inmediatamente al suelo por su propio peso, son las que c…
@parritilla No: que las gotículas, i.e., partículas gruesas que caen inmediatamente al suelo por su propio peso, son las que causan la transmisión de virus respiratorios. Si entiende inglés, recomiendo dos lecturas imprescindibles: https://t.co/dZON3vD2qk
@taquetines27421 @RafaMatas @mariaitapia @CDCgov Hemos investigado la historia y no encontramos eso. https://t.co/rx6eGm9aaV https://t.co/GiDbloyOoZ
@DellaLuna @Hope4BetterUSA @AnnaBebana @jazyjef @LaCharles88 Correct. The paper is now published: https://t.co/rx6eGm9aaV
RT @tcshields: @KDNyhan Yup. And now published: https://t.co/Kkupi8aypy I've also been thinking about the Wired article that talked about…
RT @jljcolorado: 1/ Our article on historical droplet error (#DropletDogma) just published after peer-review "How did we get here: what ar…
How did we get here: what are droplets and aerosols and how far do they go? A historical perspective on the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases | Interface Focus https://t.co/naGhcOhcXK
@kushal_mehra And the droplet fallacy ? We need people to challenge established ideas
@KDNyhan Yup. And now published: https://t.co/Kkupi8aypy I've also been thinking about the Wired article that talked about it too.
RT @JonathanYoungs: https://t.co/VM5kIymRhq https://t.co/EFY08MzVHX Historical origins of the droplet/aerosol dichotomy, the 5 micron & 2m…
https://t.co/VM5kIymRhq https://t.co/EFY08MzVHX Historical origins of the droplet/aerosol dichotomy, the 5 micron & 2m rules and how the relationships between distance+infectivity+particle size+particle trajectory all got conflated. You may enjoy @gush
How did we get here: what are droplets and aerosols and how far do they go? A historical perspective on the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases https://t.co/9ZsNNsCmTN
@ChemDelphine The failed response in BC, including Dr. Henry, is just one part of a global failure of infection control/public health, in 1000s of jurisdictions and institutions, extending up to @WHO. It is grounded in fallacies that predate the current p
RT @jljcolorado: 106/ And the Randall et al. paper was published in final form a while back (shorter period of history, from Flugge to now,…
@DavidWa59907969 @jljcolorado @CDCofBC I agree, but she didn’t achieve this colossal failure on her own. She is part of a culture of infection control/public health, in BC and globally, from @WHO on down, and stretching back decades (see article). This has
RT @jljcolorado: 106/ And the Randall et al. paper was published in final form a while back (shorter period of history, from Flugge to now,…
RT @Hiroshi_Tsuji: いずれも最新流体力学では間違いとされる •飛沫/エアロゾルのカットオフは5μm •飛沫は6feet(1.83m)飛ぶ これら起源を調べたこの査読前論文が出版されました。 各種ガイドラインはコロナで加速したエアロゾル研究や、飛沫で説明出来…
NEW: How did we get here: what are droplets and aerosols and how far do they go? A historical perspective on the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases @royalsociety From @katierandall @EThomasEwing @linseymarr @jljcolorado and Bourouiba Paper:
RT @cath_data: @LawtonTri https://t.co/SdL5Di9grQ Hope?
RT @cath_data: @LawtonTri https://t.co/SdL5Di9grQ Hope?
Citation tracking in here #medlibs and their scholarly article is here: https://t.co/BTVzGsorem
@Merz @PrasadKasibhat1 @kprather88 @stgoldst @NuritBaytch @macroliter @IKostenas @klausenhauser @angie_rasmussen @WHO @zeynep @RommieAmaro Yes, there is the correct physics-based boundary of 100 um or so, and an erroneous 5 um definition, that arose when t
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @CorsIAQ: Bingo. 👇
RT @jljcolorado: @DRO_oDR @zeynep @Merz @kprather88 @NuritBaytch @macroliter @IKostenas @klausenhauser @angie_rasmussen @WHO Indeed, an err…
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @jljcolorado: @DRO_oDR @zeynep @Merz @kprather88 @NuritBaytch @macroliter @IKostenas @klausenhauser @angie_rasmussen @WHO Indeed, an err…
@DRO_oDR @zeynep @Merz @kprather88 @NuritBaytch @macroliter @IKostenas @klausenhauser @angie_rasmussen @WHO Indeed, an error dating from the 1960s that they refuse to acknowledge: https://t.co/rx6eGlRzjn
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @CorsIAQ: Bingo. 👇
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
Bingo. 👇
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…
RT @jljcolorado: @CollignonPeter I am pretty sure you have. And the correct explanation of the EMPIRICAL observation that distance reduces…